Для полной функциональности сайта необходимо включить JavaScript.
Голосовать могут только зарегистрированные пользователи, необходимо выполнить вход.
Full moon... mysticism...
Well done, Greg!
Did you use multi-exposure technique? (one shot for moon, second for scene)
Thats a fine shot. Great colours. I like these mystic pictures.
Great shot Greg, nice mystical mood.
I imagine the horseman riding thid ridge is quite spiritrd.
Awesome!!
Another winner from the master!
My best moon photo is one white circle with nothing in it - How did you do that? It is wonderful as always - Great shot, Greg!
I had to practice a lot - most people take pics of the moon at moonrise and that`s another story - this is a moonset or sunrise and it is about two days after the full moon when the moon is setting on a ridge that runs parallel to a ridge about 400 feet away so the DOF is a problem though I do try to shoot with th aperture as small as reasonable. As the sun rises, the light differential between the light values in the sk and the moon decrease so I can detail int he moon without having a completly dark sky. Ihave some where I have silhoetted the trees and made the sky a deep blue and with even more detail in the moon. I use spot metering anf a tripod as the shutter speed is pretty slow. With my F100 - I can take light reading off the moon and sky and land. I overexposed the moon very slightly on this, and the sky was a little under exposed and it all works out. It has taken many rolls of film - and a lot of looking to discover this place. Youhave to be far enough away from the the framing elements to create the perspective and to get good DOF. My hope is to shoot this scene after a snow storm, but in 3 years - the combination hasn`t occured. Wish me luck at the first of January.
Another lesson from the master, thanks, Greg. It was worth the time and trouble. A masterpiece.
Greg, this a great shot. Mostly because the exposure is sooo touchy. Normally, a correct exposure for the moon is the same exposure you would use for daylight minus a stop for the longitudinal atmosperic absorbtion of light. Here there is the moon properly exposed and also the foreground. Which means, of course, that the foreground must be getting additional light - in this case from the sun rise. I am very puzzled why the trees are not lit with the same intensity as the foreground? Perhaps because of their dark green color. I have seen shots like this where the foreground was artifically lit (car headlights, flash, etc). As for proper moon exposure on a shot like this, say using Velvia, we are looking at 1/50 at f11. Picking up the foreground detail with this sort of exposure is really remarkable! Perhaps the clouds/mist enabled you to use a much slower setting, something like 1/12 at f11. In any case, one hell of a shot.
)
