Для полной функциональности сайта необходимо включить JavaScript.
I suggest a limit ( 100 - 120) of photographs for the Gallery of each Member of the Forum. It allows a photograph renewal and it compels to have more well-taken care in the choice of photographs.
Thus, when visiting a Gallery, we go seeing, not always the same photographs, but different photographs and each time with more quality.
What you think of this suggestion. My compliments
Jose Sarmento
I do not know, the interesting offer, but whether will result it in mess.
First, already about twenty photographers have exceeded this limit how to be with them.
Second, whether restriction is creative freedom.
In the third to look through all gallery from 100 works it it is hard, and even more difficultly and to keep up that there new.
And the last, already are some restrictions (6 works for 14 days), and it somehow, but works.
Yours faithfully.
Sergey
Good idea. But IMHO it is better to limit the number of photographs which take part in rating. Adding folders to user portfolios may be a good idea as well. As a result, photographers can use this site as their portfolio.
I agree with the last idea. I think it would be better to have to lists - Active and History. Active limited number of photos that participate in Rating, History all photos that were uploaded by the photograph
I support this idea.
I think the opinion of Bera very interesting. A Historic Gallery without limit, and an Active Gallery in the phorating. This last wiil be limited in number.
I`m sorry , the opinion is of Kakha and supported by Bera. My excuses to Kakha.
Perhaps it would be that when you reached the limit in quantity of images that you would only add an image when it was stronger than the weakest currently in the gallery. Your portfolio would only be strengthened with each addition. Your additions might become fewer but quality would gradually rise. IF space becomes an issue, otherwise add all you want.
I don`t understand you, Jose. You want me to delete my old pictures? What`s the reason? They just lying somewhere in the dust making no harm to you or anybody else.
For quality improoving? I`m not sure that new pictures will be always better (and what is it "better"?). For ratings, these meaningless numbers?
My sugestion is for that the gallery be more and more better, in ourself opinion. When we reached the limit we must do an choice and I think that the quality (out the rating ) wuld be better.
I also liked idea Kakha, it demands wider discussion, including in Russian.
Dear Jose. Imagine:
I have 50 new (good) pictures and 50 old (bad), then I post another one (very good) picture.
Current situation: I have 51 good pictures + still 50 bad
Your proposal: I have 51 good pictures and 49 bad
I see only one difference: 1 picture`s lost. I have no doubt, Jose, no one will notice it `cause rare person cares what picture I have posted 6 monthes ago. Most people look only at new posted pictures so they will see the same "very good" picture anyway.
